[Oral Communication] Clinical application of PLANET® Dose V3.2 on Single-Time-Point Dosimetry in Patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE

Susana Veloza-Awad1, 2, 3 , Yacine Bencheikh1, José Fragoso-Negrín1, 2, 3 , Manuel Bardiès1, 2 , Lore Santoro1,2 

 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, (ICM), France
2 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Équipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, INSERM U1194, ICM, Université de Montpellier, France,Toulouse Neuro Imaging Center – Université Toulouse III – Paul Sabatier, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Toulouse Mind Brain Institut – France
3 DOSIsoft, Cachan, France

 

ABSTRACT

Background: An absorbed dose-effect correlation was observed for [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE treatments in patients with neuroendocrine tumours, using a four-time-point (4TP) dosimetry protocol. However, reducing the number of time points would ease the workload and patient burden. Simplified approaches such as single-time-point (STP) dosimetry should therefore be investigated. This study examines the feasibility of implementing STP dosimetry using patient-specific pharmacokinetics from the first cycle

Methods: For 25 patients, 4TP dosimetry was performed for the first and second treatment cycles, using PLANET® Dose V3.2 (Dosisoft, Cachan, France) with images acquired at 4, 24, 72, and 192 hours post-injection. For the second cycle, two STP-based approaches were then evaluated and compared with the 4TP reference results. The first approach used the 4TP-absorbed dose from the first cycle, scaled by the volume-to-total counts ratio at 24 hours from both cycles. The second approach used the STP tool of PLANET® Dose to assign pharmacokinetics from the first cycle to a single point at 24 or 72 hours.

Results: At 24 hours, the second approach showed smaller deviations from 4TP dosimetry than the proportional scaling approach. However, the best agreement was obtained with the second approach at 72 hours, with relative differences below 9% for liver and kidneys, and up to 20% for spleen and tumours.

Conclusion: STP dosimetry offers logistical advantages. This study shows it can yield results in good agreement with MTP dosimetry. Further research is needed to confirm whether absorbed dose–effect relationships are preserved.